The competition: FWA vs. cable and satellite

Fixed Wireless Access (FWA) is disrupting the broadband market by introducing competition to traditional cable and satellite internet services. Major communication service providers are investing in FWA as part of their network expansion strategies, aiming to capture new market segments and enhance customer retention.

Due to 5G advancements and mid-band spectrum (C-band) improvements, FWA offers lower latency and greater reliability compared to satellite internet, which suffers from high latency due to long signal distances. Additionally, FWA is less susceptible to weather-related disruptions than satellite due to innovations like beamforming and network slicing, providing a stronger and more stable connection and minimizing interruptions even under the most unfavorable conditions. With competitive pricing and lower setup costs, FWA is becoming a viable option in rural areas over satellite internet.

Cable companies are also feeling the pressure from FWA competition, with their share of the residential market projected to decline. To counter this, cable providers are emphasizing their internet speeds and launching mobile offerings to attract and retain customers. 

As FWA continues to grow, it is expected to play a pivotal role in addressing connectivity needs and bridging the digital divide across diverse communities; through the implementation of iconectiv TruOps Common Language CLFI and CLCI S/S Codes, wireless supporting facilities and special service circuits are categorized and connected, aiding to minimize hiccups in FWA deployment and streamline services.